Five questions with Justice George C. Carlson

Judge George Carlson was appointed to the State Supreme Court by Governor Ronnie Musgrove to fill the Northern District seat vacated by Justice Mike Mills. The longtime Batesville resident will mark his third anniversary on the Court this October.

Prior being elevated to the state’s high court, Carlson served for almost two decades as Circuit Judge for DeSoto, Panola, Tallahatchie, Tate, and Yalobusha Counties.

Carlson is running for re-election this year against Columbus attorney Bill Bambach.

1. How has the atmosphere changed on the Mississippi Supreme Court over the past year?
Admittedly, when I came to the Court over 2 ½ years ago, there was division on the Court. But over the past year, there has been much change for the better. We have just recently eliminated our back log of cases on direct appeal which were over 270 days old from the time they were submitted to the Court for decision. The Court is currently comprised of hard-working judges who are making every effort to efficiently, but correctly, decide the cases before us on a timely basis for the sake of the citizens who come before us.

2. What is your typical day like on the Court?
I have always been an early riser. I wake up, exercise, and arrive at the Court between 6:30 – 7:00 a.m., and remain until 7:30 – 8:00 p.m. I ordinarily eat both breakfast and lunch at the office. There is too much time wasted by attempting to go out and eat. The goal each day is to be working on opinions for cases which have been assigned to me. Also, I study opinions which have been written by the other justices to see if I agree or disagree with the opinions. Each justice will “vote” to agree or disagree on the proposed opinions which are written by the other justices. If I disagree with an opinion written by another justice, then I will write a separate opinion – ordinarily a dissenting opinion. I have a dedicated and hard working staff in my office – a Judicial Assistant and two Law Clerks, who greatly assist me in my work.

3. Are there reforms that need to be made to Mississippi’s judicial system?
Absolutely. Before arriving at the Supreme Court on November 1, 2001, I served as a circuit judge in a 5-county district in northwest Mississippi for 19 years. I have to admit that prior to arriving at the Court, I was unaware of some problems which existed in our judiciary around the state, both at the trial and appellate levels. In my opinion, we have an outstanding state judiciary; however, as I have said many times before, that although we have an exemplary system of justice, it is not perfect because of the fact that it was devised and continues to be implemented by mere human beings. Because of that, our system of justice will sometimes fail; however, I am convinced that it is the least imperfect system of justice which has ever existed on this Earth. We must continue to look at our existing Mississippi judicial system to see how it can be improved for the sake of our citizens. I feel an obligation to our citizens to be aggressive in attacking any existing problems in our system. We at the Court want to continue to make sure that all parties coming into our state courts have a level playing field. All trial and appellate judges need to be about the business of strictly interpreting our laws and not “legislating.” Judges through their decisions do not need to be attempting to write the law. Our decisions and rules changes over the past few months indicate an overall desire of the Court to bring some consistency to how certain cases are tried in Mississippi

4. What do you do with your spare time?
If my wife and children answered this question for me, they would probably respond “what spare time?” My past hobbies pretty well became non- existent when I went on the circuit court bench in 1983. As any Mississippi trial or appellate judge can tell you, there is simply not too much spare time in the life of a judge. The spare time I do have, I try to make sure is devoted to church and family.

5. What’s more exciting: a South Panola football game or the typical case on the Supreme Court docket?
You really put me on the spot with this question. I suppose that it is like comparing apples and oranges. I love my work at the Court. Every case brings on a unique challenge, no matter how routine it may appear. I have often said that open heart surgery may be routine for that doctor who has performed hundreds of similar surgeries, but it is not routine for that patient on the operating table (or that patient’s family). Likewise, although we may have “typical” cases, we as judges recognize that it is an important case for those directly involved in the case – and that is how I approach every case. I have been honored for a good many years to be a part of the radio crew broadcasting South Panola football every Friday night during the football season. My family has recognized this is a welcome outlet for me after a week in Court. I am a South Panola graduate, so this is certainly a labor of love. I am proud to be associated with such outstanding coaches and players. Our coaches are persons of high character who teach our players much more than the game of football, and our players are really outstanding young men who have responded to what our coaches are trying to teach them.

 


 



Advertisements